October 3, 2010

I have just returned from a trip to the ETH in Zurich where I was talking to academics and Masters degree students working in computer-aided architectural design and the theory behind it. This was a very enjoyable and productive interdisciplinary discussion. I gave a talk on the history of architectonics in philosophy and how the ‘crisis of foundations’ lead to a re-thinking of architectonics. Our discussions explored the relations between the disciplines and how these can be articulated today. From the abstract and over-arching architectonics constructed before the crisis we moved to the more concrete and practical architectonics of today. In many ways it was Deleuze and Guattari who provided the focus for the session. The ‘rhizome’ of their A Thousand Plateaus provided the emblem for the relations of disciplines that do not involve foundations or deep roots but rather a horizontal plane without beginnings or endings.
I
learnt about the concerns of architects who work with computers. Just as philosophers seem to have lost their place in an age of information, specialisation and interdisciplinarity, so architects are challenged to find their place in a world of computer-aided practice. I also learnt about the moral concerns of architects. Individualism seems to be a poor response to a crisis of foundations when spaces exceed the individual. We also discussed the ability of disciplines to communicate. Do we simply throw up walls of disciplinary concepts which prevent dialogue? In many ways the discussions we were having involved an encounter with problems that all disciplines share. Different disciplines ‘spark off’ thoughts in one another. I certainly found that I was thinking new thoughts through my discussions with architects and theorists in this field. Deleuze and Guattari talk about the encounters with chaos which are common to all disciplines in their What is Philosophy? Each discipline goes to its limit, to that which it cannot articulate, and this proves to be a productive exercise. It does not reduce one discipline to another but is more of what Deleuze calls a ‘discordant accord’. This means that there does not need to be a rationally transparent discourse which over-arches all disciplines. Instead we have a series of unexpected thoughts which challenge each discipline and express multiple and heterogeneous connections. Each discipline is understood as a create practice and it is the principles behind this practice which, for Deleuze and Guattari, have the potential to relate the disciplines.
Another thing I learnt about were the views on diagrammatic thinking among those working in computer-aided architectural design and its theory. I suggested that diagrams might allow disciplines to communicate beyond their conceptual boundaries. I learnt a lot about the problems of seeking to overcome semantics using diagrammatic structures. There seems to be no easy way of handing theoretical problems over to computers and expecting them to overcome aporias and boundaries that continue to press upon us. These discussions proved to be very worthwhile and leave me with lines of thought which I am eager to pursue.
Posted by Edward Willatt. Posted In : Architectonics
September 23, 2010

My book is published today. I am keen to gage reactions to the book because it was intended to intervene in current debates including those concerning the way we read Kant, transcendental arguments and the nature of Deleuze’s thought. I cannot help wondering what the response will be to my approach. I give a close reading of parts of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason in an attempt to ‘return to basics’, trying to understand the starting point of this book and the nature of the ‘ar...
Continue reading...
Posted by Edward Willatt. Posted In : Architectonics
September 21, 2010
I am currently working on an introductory lecture on architectonics which I will be delivering in Zurich next week. I am always struck by the way in which this subject makes one return to the basics of philosophy. A concern with the foundation, or lack of foundation, of knowledge is refreshing. One has to think about whether philosophy has, or should have, solid ground beneath its feet. It may be argued that this is too simple and naïve in its approach given the advances made in philosop...
Continue reading...
Posted by Edward Willatt. Posted In : Architectonics
September 19, 2010
In my recent posts I have expressed my frustration with teaching theory and the discipline of education in general. However, there is a depth of scholarship in this field that I am in danger of overlooking. One has to spend the time to look into this rather than being rushed by the requirements of a course. Sarah Benesch has looked at the role of classrooms as space or arenas of social change (‘Critical Praxis as Materials Development: Responding to Military Recruitment on a U.S. Campu...
Continue reading...
Posted by Edward Willatt. Posted In : Education
September 17, 2010
An obsession with measuring activity means that it needs to be obvious and unmistakable. This is the only way we can be sure about it and calm our fears. When it comes to teacher training, such as course I am currently undertaking, it is often assumed that one is passive when one is listening. ‘Lecturing is the least effective form of teaching’, we assume. It is supposed that we retain the least information if we are listening. We must ask ‘Are my students active?’ We must prove...
Continue reading...
Posted by Edward Willatt. Posted In : Education
September 8, 2010
The mire of teacher training in which I am currently submerged brings a number of things into focus. Whilst psychology dominates in education theory there is some use of philosophy. The discipline of education or teaching emerged relatively recently and it is made up of elements from other disciplines. However, the philosophy used is often half-digested and the terms of the debate too limited. The reason given for this is that we need to be practical and focused upon what applies and wo...
Continue reading...
Posted by Edward Willatt. Posted In : Education
August 19, 2010
A very interesting debate has been taking place between different bloggers over the way we should read philosophy. The issue is whether thinkers like Kant, Husserl or Derrida can be presented as realists in order to meet the challenges posed by speculative realism and object-oriented philosophy. The notion that such philosophies are caught in the ‘correlationist circle’, as Quentin Meillassoux argues, has been challenged by those seeking to establish the realist credentials of these phi...
Continue reading...
Posted by Edward Willatt. Posted In : Transcendental Philosophy
July 19, 2010
This news story about some unseen Kafka manuscripts points to a real problem: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-10682482 . An expert is being allowed to look at this unpublished work in order to help a judge rule over the ownership of the manuscripts. It seems very wrong that privately owned manuscripts can be kept secret. Even if the documents belong to a private individual the writings contained could surely be made public. Scholars may have no access to potentially important work ...
Continue reading...
Posted by Edward Willatt. Posted In : Literature and History
July 19, 2010
I am trying to write about something that has preoccupied me for a number of years. This is the relation between Deleuze and Badiou. Their differences have been a major focus for recent debates over the future of philosophy. Their have been sustained and sometimes polemic treatments of Deleuze’s work which follow Badiou in alleging the neglect of the actual in favour of the virtual, the political and scientific in favour of the artistic, and the spatial in favour of the temporal. Resp...
Continue reading...
Posted by Edward Willatt. Posted In : Deleuze and Badiou
May 24, 2010
The challenge posed to transcendental philosophy by forms of naturalism has been a theme of philosophy since Kant. However, the challenge today is particular strong and its arguments persuasive. The emerging movements of speculative realism and object-oriented philosophy continue to gather momentum. Transcendental philosophy is charged with being limited by the correlation between thought and being or consciousness and reality. It suffers from a lack of ambition, a modesty that makes it a...
Continue reading...
Posted by Edward Willatt. Posted In : Transcendental Philosophy